Political Insults Today Are Tame Compared With Past

You’ve seen the clips. Hillary Clinton equates Republicans with terrorists. Donald Trump says fellow Republican Rick Perry should be forced to take an IQ test. Carly Fiorina calls Hillary a liar for misleading Americans about her e-mail scandal.

Pretty nasty stuff, right?

18 Apr 2015, Nashua, New Hampshire, USA --- FILE - In this April 18, 2015 file photo, Carly Fiorina speaks at the Republican Leadership Summit in Nashua, N.H. (AP Photo/Jim Cole) --- Image by © Jim Cole/AP/Corbis
                   Carly Fiorina

Not really; not when you look at the kind of mudslinging gutter politics that existed in the 19th Century and the early part of the 20th Century.

I happened upon some of these gems of abuse when I was researching Book #2 in my Finding Billy Battles trilogy.

Book #2 begins in 1894 and moves into the early 20th Century and as I was looking for information about President William McKinley I discovered modern politicians have a long way to go to best their counterparts from 100 and 200 years ago when it comes to personal attacks and world class mudslinging.

Just take a look at some of these zingers:

In 1898, while serving as Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Navy, Theodore Roosevelt became convinced that President William McKinley was a vacillator. He said of the President, “McKinley had no more backbone than a chocolate eclair.” Ironically, in 1900 Roosevelt became McKinley’s Vice Presidential Running Mate.

During the election of 1884 between Democrat Grover Cleveland and Republican James G. Blaine, Blaine’s camp jumped on the fact that Cleveland had sired a child out of wedlock (obviously a much greater transgression then than now).

The Blaine camp came up with this little ditty to celebrate Cleveland’s indiscretion: “Ma, Ma, Where’s My Pa? Gone to the White House, Ha Ha Ha.”

220px-Ma_ma_wheres_my_pa
 Ma, Ma Where’s My Pa?

Not to be outdone, Cleveland’s handlers responded with this little ode: “Blaine, Blaine, James G. Blaine, The Continental Liar from the State of Maine.”

Turning the clock back even further we see that the 1800 campaign between Thomas Jefferson and John Adams was no walk in the political park.

In that election (the only in American history where a vice-president ran against a sitting president), Jefferson called Adams a “repulsive pedant” and a “hideous hermaphroditical character which has neither the force and firmness of a man, nor the gentleness and sensibility of a woman.”

Adams responded by asking voters who might be considering voting for Jefferson: “Are you prepared to see your dwellings in flames… female chastity violated…children writhing on the pike? Great God of Compassion and Justice, Shield my Country from Destruction.”               

After that election, Congress passed the 12th Amendment to the Constitution, which mercifully changed the rule that the presidential candidate who got the second most votes would automatically be vice-president. From then on, each presidential candidate picked a running mate, thereby avoiding the prospect of a sitting president having to run against his own vice-president.

 Move forward to 1828 and what many consider the most contentious, nastiest presidential campaign in American history–Andrew Jackson versus John Adams son, incumbent President John Quincy Adams.

Adams, of the Federalist party, fired the first shot in this vicious contest, saying that Jackson was a murderer, had the personality of a dictator and was too uneducated to be president (they claimed he spelled Europe ‘Urope’).

And they didn’t stop there. The Adams camp decided it wasn’t enough to go after Jackson. They would attack his wife, Rachel, and his mother too.

By David Kiley Political strategists have been mostly unwavering in the belief that negative ads work during a Presidential race. But the action so far in 2008 has given some of them reason to believe this election cycle may be a different battlefield. Mitt Romney and John Edwards went negative early and often, and both are now out of the contest. For the remaining contenders, negative ads also pose big risks. Hillary Clinton pulled unfavorable radio spots from the South Carolina primary after less than 24 hours, when her campaign's rhetoric against Barack Obama was perceived as racial, if not racist. Ads attacking John McCain's policy for maintaining a long-term U.S. military presence in Iraq must be carefully balanced against his record as a patriot who spent five years as a Vietnam prisoner of war. Some strategists, including Texas-based Democratic campaign and opposition research expert Jason Stanford, believe the increased role independent and young voters will play this November "makes going negative more complicated this year than in past years," he says. Cynical and overly negative messages seem to be out of step with the country's zeitgeist this year. "Positive is the new black," in terms of fashion, says Deutsch Chairman Donny Deutsch, who hosts CNBC's The Big Idea. Deutsch points to this year's Super Bowl ads as being more positive and uplifting than ads of the last two years, which tended to be snarky, mean, or drawing on black humor. One expert in negative political advertising is Kerwin Swint, associate professor of political science at Kennesaw State University in Georgia and author of Mudslingers: The Top 25 Negative Political Campaigns of All Time.
       Jackson & Adams

Jackson’s mother, the Adams camp said, was a prostitute.

Before marrying Jackson, Rachel had been in an abusive marriage with a man who eventually divorced her. In the early 19th Century divorce was still considered a scandalous affair. The Federalists called Rachel a “dirty black wench,” and a “convicted adulteress” who was prone to “open and notorious lewdness.”

Jackson’s handlers responded by charging that when Adams was serving as the ambassador to Russia he had sold his wife’s maid as a concubine to the czar of Russia. They branded Adams a “Pimp to the Coalition,” a reference to the Russian government.

Jackson won 642,553 votes to Adams’ 500,897.

Later in the 19th century, Tennessee Congressman Davy Crockett accused Martin Van Buren of secretly wearing women’s clothing: “He is laced up in women’s corsets.”

James Buchanan, who had a congenital condition that caused his head to tilt to the left, was accused of having unsuccessfully attempting to hang himself.

In the election of 1876 Democrats claimed Rutherford B. Hayes shot and wounded his own mother in a drunken “fit of insanity.”

Not even Republican Abraham Lincoln, the great emancipator, was immune from slinging the sludge and being whacked with it.

In the 1860 election campaign Stephen Douglas called Lincoln a “horrid­ looking wretch, sooty and scoundrelly (sic) in aspect, a cross between the nutmeg dealer, the horse­ swapper and the night man” (whoever or whatever the night man is).

And he didn’t stop there. Lincoln, he said, “is the leanest, lankest, most ungainly mass of legs and arms and hatchet face ever strung on a single frame.”  And, he continued, he has stinky feet.

Lincoln_Douglas_debates
                      Lincoiln & Douglas

Wow, how low can you go.

Lincoln responded by calling Douglas, who was only 5-feet 4-inches tall, the “little giant.”

“Douglas is about five feet nothing in height and about the same in diameter the other way,” Lincoln said.

When Douglas left Washington D.C. for New York city on the train he told the press he was taking a leisurely trip to visit his mother, when in fact, he was going on the campaign trail.

Lincoln and his supporters took note of the fact that it took him more than a month to get to New York and even put out a “Lost Child” handbill that said Douglas: “Left Washington, D.C. sometime in July, to go home to his mother…who is very anxious about him. Seen in Philadelphia, New York City, Hartford, Conn., and at a clambake in Rhode Island. Answers to the name Little Giant. Talks a great deal, very loud, always about himself.”

During Lincoln’s reelection campaign of 1864 his Democrat opponent George McClellan described Lincolnas: “nothing more than a well-meaning baboon!”

It is only my opinion, but I think the folks running for president today are amateurs when it comes to venting their gall, slinging the slime and generally putting their opponents’ noses out of joint. They could all take a few lessons from history.

As Lord Chesterfield once said: “An injury is much sooner forgotten than an insult.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

comments