At a book signing during the Los Angeles Times Festival of Books a while back, where I was promoting my Finding Billy Battles trilogy, I was asked several times about the research process for writing historical fiction novels.
I explained that researching the first book in the Finding Billy Battles trilogy began with my own memories. I grew up in Kansas, listening to the way my great-grandparents, grandparents, and parents spoke. Everybody in my family grew up in Kansas, so it is no stretch to say that I was immersed in “Kansas-speak” from an early age.
![]() |
Curious Readers Lined up for Billy Battles |
Transportation was an adventure. Trains were the fastest way to get from point A to point B–IF there were tracks. Horses were the most common means of moving about. I had to get all of that right down to the sounds, the smells, and so on.
Historical fiction demands accuracy. Otherwise, your readers will not believe your story. We all suspend our disbelief when we read fiction, but even then, we want the story to have a genuine ring to it. You cannot achieve that if you aren’t accurate with the construction of your setting, the behavior of your characters, and the vernacular of the era. Those were all challenges I faced, but I enjoyed facing them–just as I enjoyed facing the long line of curious readers who came to have their Billy Battles books signed at the L.A. Times Festival of Books.
In book two of the Finding Billy Battles trilogy (The Improbable Journeys of Billy Battles), I faced even more challenges because Billy finds himself in French Indochina, the Philippines, Hong Kong, and Japan of the 1890s–and those places were a veritable paradise for polyglots, miscreants, spies, and people running away from something, just as Billy Battles is.
I cannot emphasize enough the importance of accuracy in developing a historical novel. Readers need to trust you when you describe a place, a city, or an event. They almost want you to have been there so you can present them with an accurate picture of the place and time. For me, recreating 19th-century settings like Lawrence, Denver, Chicago, and New Mexico, among others, was part of the fun of writing. I want my readers to “see” what I am seeing and what my characters are seeing, hearing, and feeling.
As I mentioned in Part One of this blog topic, I prefer to refer to my writing as “Faction.” It is a blend of the journalist’s ability to gather accurate information and the fiction writer’s ability to imagine and create compelling characters and stories.
–30–
(Next: (Part Three) Three Things I Learned While Writing The Finding Billy Battles Trilogy)
If you enjoyed this post, please consider subscribing to ForeignCorrespondent and tell your friends to subscribe. “It’s free—what a deal!” If you’ve received this from a friend and would like to be added to our distribution list for future blog posts, simply enter your email in the notifications box to sign up:
https://ronaldyatesbooks.com/category/foreign-correspondent.
You can also find my commentaries on Substack at https://ronyates.substack.com/ and the American Free News Network at https://afnn.us.
Please feel free to comment: We genuinely love hearing from you!