Have Chicago Voters Said they Deserve to Get it “Good and Hard?”

As I always acknowledge when I post about Chicago, I am not a native Chicagoan. However, I spent 27 years with the Chicago Tribune, where I held a variety of positions, from reporter and editor to foreign correspondent and member of the editorial board.

So, even though I am not a native, I grew to love the City of Big Shoulders, as Carl Sandburg once called it. Naturally, like a lot of native or near-beer native Chicagoans, I worry about the future of a city that has been taken over by far-left and socialist zealots such as its mayor-elect, Brandon Johnson.

The city has turned into a lawless, almost dystopian place where throngs of rioters can rampage through the Loop, burning cars, attacking pedestrians, and looting stores with nary a cop in sight. I can absolutely guarantee you that such lawlessness could never have happened in the Chicago I first encountered in the early 1970s. That Chicago was run by a hard-ass Democrat mayor named Richard J. Daley.

Any teenage hooligans who attempted to rampage through the Loop would have been clobbered by truncheon-wielding cops and tossed into the slammer. Not today, though. The new mayor says we shouldn’t “vilify” these misunderstood and underprivileged children.

Today, I am reprinting a post by former Chicago journalist Steve Huntley that appeared in JohnKassNews.com-—a blog produced by former Chicago Tribune columnist John Kass. In it, Huntley takes to task those who allowed this leftist takeover of Chicago by not going to the polls in the mayoral run-off election and casting their votes for sanity. So now, Chicago is going to “get it good and hard,” Huntley says.

I agree, and it’s sad to say, but the city deserves the crime, corruption, tax increases, and mismanagement that is coming its way during the next few years.

Have Chicago Voters Said They Deserve to Get It “Good and Hard?”   

By Steve Huntley

“Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard.”

That observation comes from the great 20th-century journalist, satirist, and iconoclast H.L. Mencken.

Who would have guessed that Mencken’s warning would come true for Chicago so soon?

Less than two weeks after Chicago voters endorsed the hard-left mayoral candidacy of Brandon Johnson, throngs of riotous youths with mayhem and anarchy in their hearts invaded downtown Chicago, bringing fear, gunfire wounding two, a car fire-bombed, assault, looting and a vivid picture of a town suffering the logical repercussions of soft-on-crime progressivism.

Brandon Johnson: Chicago’s New Socialist Mayor

Soon-to-be mayor Johnson mouthed platitudes condemning “destructive activity,” but he soon revealed his true feelings — “it is not constructive to demonize youth who have otherwise been starved of opportunities in their own communities.”

You’re worried about their feelings Mr. Johnson?

The true victims are not the terrorized Chicagoans and tourists in the Loop but these poor teens suffering from the injustices of oppressive, racist America and low tax rates for corporations and the wealthy.

Lame duck Mayor Lori Lightfoot was just as out of touch. She called the awful spectacle “reckless, disrespectful and unlawful” but also scapegoated the police and then allowed that it “is wrong … to say that it was mayhem.”

The images and testimony of the innocent terrorized — like one woman whose husband was pulled from their vehicle and assaulted — tell a different story.

But like all good progressives, the mayor is adept at calling reality something else.

Recall that during the 2020 Black Lives Matter riots, a CNN reporter was standing in front of a firebombed business while a caption underneath the video read “Fiery But Mostly Peaceful Protests after Police Shooting.”

“Mostly peaceful protest” was repeated time and again as rioters burned small businesses and looted stores. To the far left, the business owners and residents robbed, firebombed, and terrified in those “mostly peaceful protests” were just collateral damage in the noble pursuit of “social justice.”

Then there was the Biden administration official who the other day said he doesn’t “buy the whole argument of chaos” in the humiliating U.S. pullout from Afghanistan in 2021. Those Afghans desperate to escape the Taliban and who clung to the body of a U.S. aircraft as it took off before falling to their deaths might have called that chaos — if they had survived it.

To the Biden administration, they were just collateral damage on the road to an America free of Afghanistan.

Then there’s the reality-bending of progressives who tell us that a man can get pregnant. Or assert that biological men have a right to compete in women’s sports.

For daring to challenge that alternative universe, former college swimmer Riley Gaines — denied a trophy by a male swimmer — was assaulted, placed under siege and put in fear of her life by thugs at San Francisco State University who objected to hearing a view they disagreed with.

To progressives, the women athletes denied trophies and championships are just collateral damage on the journey to a trans nirvana.

So, Johnson and Lightfoot have plenty of company in denying reality. Those Chicagoans and tourists left terrorized by the weekend rioting? They’re just collateral damage on the journey to progressive heaven for Chicago.

Chicago: Once a Great City that Worked

Actually, the Loop rioting and mayhem shouldn’t have been a surprise to anyone.

When you elect a far-left union organizer to be mayor and re-elect a progressive criminal-coddling prosecutor, as Cook County did two years ago, the voters shouldn’t be astonished when law-breaking teens unleash chaos in the Loop. These teens may be poorly educated by the Chicago Teachers Union but they can understand election results and come to the logical conclusion that law and order are out the window.

And make no mistake about it, the progressive vision of criminals as victims of an unjust society seem to be the prevailing view of most Chicago voters.

How else to understand the election results?

A city facing a crime crisis rejected the crime-fighting candidate Paul Vallas to elect the progressive defund-the-police candidate Johnson to replace progressive soft-on-crime incumbent Lightfoot as mayor of the nation’s third largest city.

The defeat of a safe-streets-and-safe-neighborhoods candidate was much worse than indicated by Johnson’s 51 to 49 percent victory margin over Vallas.

Vallas got just under half of the votes of the 33 percent of registered Chicago voters who turned out April 4. Doing the math suggests only about 16 percent of Chicago’s voters wanted to return to the tried-and-true crime-combating policies — broken windows policing, community policing, cops supported by the governing elite — that had made Chicago such a safe city before the BLM riots.

It’s worth repeating: Only one-third of Chicago’s registered voters turned out for the runoff. Two-thirds of the voters — more than a million of them — sat out this critical election.

An obvious, reasonable, and logical conclusion is that the vast majority of Chicagoans were satisfied with the way things were going in Chicago.

They watched BLM rioting, looting, and arson, they’ve seen the stories of constant carjackings and permissive local prosecutors and judges releasing the violent, and they saw no reason to go to the polls to return the city to safety.

They watched crime and fear of it creep into once safe neighborhoods and saw no reason to put in the mayor’s office a candidate committed to rebuilding police ranks and cop morale.

They watched businesses buckle and some of them close under the stress of unrestrained and unpunished shoplifting, other crime and fear of “mostly peaceful protests” and saw no reason to come out at the polls to change the direction of the city.

They watched earlier outbreaks of teens wreaking havoc in the Loop and along Michigan Avenue and decided they didn’t need to register any displeasure at the ballot box.

They watched leftist extremists in the state legislature abolish cash bail for criminals and saw no reason to shout no with their votes.

Perhaps someone should update that wonderful song about a once wonderful city made famous by Frank Sinatra along the lines of …

This is a progressive kind of town,

Chicago is a woke kind of town,

Chicago is a crime kind of town,

Chicago is one town that will let you down,

Chicago is a progressive kind of town.

Now we’ll see how the wisdom of Mencken plays out:

“Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard.”

-30-

About the author:

Steve Huntley is a retired Chicago journalist now living in Austin, Texas.

For almost three decades, Huntley spent his long and distinguished journalism career in Chicago at the Chicago Sun-Times, where he was a feature writer, metro reporter, night city editor, metropolitan editor, editorial page editor, and a columnist for the opinion pages and editor of the Sun-Times Editorial Page.

                      Steve Huntley

He has contributed several fine pieces to johnkassnews.com, from his examination of Chicago’s secret political jail housing Christopher Columbus and other politically problematic statues to Americans suffering from Joe Biden Gas Pain, and “Orwellian Warning: Newspeak, Public Safety and Chicago’s Rising Violent Crime.”

Previous to his work at the Sun-Times, Huntley was a reporter and editor with United Press International (UPI) in the South and Chicago, and Chicago bureau chief, and a senior editor in Washington with U.S. News & World Report.

Huntley is also the author of an award-winning book, “Knocking Down Barriers: My Fight for Black America, by Truman K. Gibson Jr. with Steve Huntley, a memoir of a Chicagoan who was a member of President Roosevelt’s World War II Black Cabinet working to desegregate the military.

[If you enjoyed this post, please consider subscribing to ForeignCorrespondent and tell your friends to subscribe. IT’S FREE! WHAT A DEAL! If you’ve received this from a friend and would like to be added to our distribution list for future blog posts, please enter your email address in the sign-up for notifications box at https://ronaldyatesbooks.com/category/foreign-correspondent. You can also find my commentaries on Substack at https://ronyates.substack.com/ and the American Free News Network at https://afnn.us. And please feel free to comment. WE LOVE COMMENTS!]

 

About Ronald E. Yates

Ronald E. Yates is an award-winning author of historical fiction and action/adventure novels, including the popular and highly-acclaimed Finding Billy Battles trilogy. Read More About Ron Here

2 thoughts on “Have Chicago Voters Said they Deserve to Get it “Good and Hard?””

  1. And when Downtown Chicago looks like a pos-apocolyptic deserted septic pit from a “Mad Max” movie, it will not be their fault, but ours!

    Hard to imagine that our Nation could allowed to go from a shining utopia to a worldwide irrelevant joke in a few short years, but then it has taken the anti-Americans two generations of grooming to get that result!

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Ronald E. Yates Cancel reply